Immigration

welcome to change.org's immigration blog!

Published October 08, 2008 @ 06:23AM PT

I'm honored and excited to be blogging for change.org on immigration issues.  I am an immigration attorney at a nonprofit legal services organization, so I am most familiar with U.S. immigration law and policy.  However, I am interested in migration as a global phenomenon and in the ways the U.S. immigration system overlaps (or doesn't) with international human rights law.

I also believe that immigration cannot be viewed in a vacuum, but must be seen in the context of foreign policy in its many facets: trade, environment, war, aid, finance, diplomacy, etc.

I've blogged on immigration as "yave begnet" at a couple of group/community blogs--Citizen Orange and the Sanctuary--so check out my co-bloggers there for additional informed perspectives on the subject.

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (42)

  1. pierre Montilus

    I think every one are immigrant,I would like the president to force congress to pass the bill where they should  give a TPS for every one who are in USA where all immigrant going ta have finger print to identified all the criminals and the terrorist.................. please every one who read that comments understand I don't speak english very well . thank you.

    Posted by pierre Montilus on 12/14/2008 @ 02:38PM PT

  2. Robert Jones

    And they will do it to you as well, the goverment is an = opertunity oppressor. Its in the works and by the way the president can't force congress or the courts to do any thing, study some civics, but don't you worry the goverment will with all its power will tag each and every one of us Americans and anyone else for that matter here and put you and every one here in the good o'l U.S.A either on a no fly, no buy or no work list, or some kind of list to control each and every one us. It's called the Real I.d. act, compleat with R.F.I.D. tracker chip and it will also be your bank card. and put satalite track and tax in your car(s). Don't you just love the freedom. Don't wish for tyrenny for others because its a two edged sword because it may or will fall on you as well.

    Posted by Robert Jones on 07/04/2009 @ 11:27PM PT

  3. Reply to thread
  4. D D Bianco

    Even with 40,000 attorneys flooding the country, they will always be in demand. Don't be so quick to assume that immigrants are the bad guys and that they are out to steal jobs. Walk a mile in their shoes. I challenge you, Mr. Bashore, to walk a mile in the shoe of a fresh faced high school student, guilty of nothing more or less than being brought to this country as an infant by parents who never legalized their status. Is this child, who has lived their entire lives here and knows no other homeland, any less of an American than you are? I challenge you to look one of them in the eye and answer that question.

    Mr. Bennion, please continue your work, I applaud your efforts to better the situation of immigrants in this country.

    Posted by D D Bianco on 01/09/2009 @ 08:26PM PT

  5. Robert Jones

    Attorneys, for the most part are involved in the judicial slave trade industrie in one form or another, with a few exceptions very few. They are not really looking out for your best intrests, especialy in crimminal case's, and some civil/crimmnal case's as well did you now that the judges get 5% of all fines and siezures and court costs placed in their retirment account, so its in their best interest to destroy you and imprison you. Very few judges work for the interest of justice, oh by the way when they imprison you the county and the states as well as the federal level. The goverment system bonds and trades your assigned value on the national and international bond markets. your prison I.D. is your bond number as well as your SSN, The prison industrial complex by the way Dick Chaney is an owner of the biggest private prison cooperation's in the world. see info  http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/print_friendly.php?p=America-s-Prince-of-Darkne-by-dick-overfield-081119-697.html And Dyncor a D.O.D. contractor working for the U.S. Government is involved in international human trafficking of woman and children in the sex slave markets world wide. and its admitted by the U.S. Government to be true. see info http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eootfzAhAoUI wouldn't doubt for a minute that they do this as well with immigration as well. The U.S. Goverment is illagitament and is not what we grew up to belive it is, you can all deny it, but the facts are clear. So don't think for a minute these people are looking out for your est interests.

    Posted by Robert Jones on 07/05/2009 @ 12:04AM PT

  6. Reply to thread
  7. james lane

    DD Bianco,

    Your comment "Even with 40,000 attorneys flooding the country, they will always be in demand", defies everything I learned in four years of college economics. The law of supply and demand works with labor as well as with money and goods. The more labor the lower the price of that labor will be the result. That is what alarms me the most. That is the lowering the living standards of millions of Americans. The creation of a super large impoverished class and all the problems that go along with it.

    Posted by james lane on 01/10/2009 @ 06:57AM PT

  8. Kevin  Browning

    To me, the issue isn't who is the "bad guy?" It's what kind of a future do we want? It seems that no matter how reasonable a person is when they call for reductions in immigration levels, the pro-immigration people just try to make them look like they are insensitive at best and a hate-mongering racist at worst. There are so many compassionate and practical reasons to reduce immigration levels, it's a shame that a sincere conversation is not permitted.
    For starters, the United States is already overpopulated. If you don't know this, you really have a lot to learn about reality. There are water shortages all over, overflowing landfills, overcrowded schools, dwindling wetlands and and other kinds of wildlife habitat destruction. The list goes on. And the FACT is that the population growth is a result of immigration and the high birthrates of immigrants. There is nothing mean-spirited about pointing out reality. Denying reality, and trying to paint honest, caring people as having evil motivations is what is truly dangerous.
    Take a good, hard look at what truly motivates you. Ask yourself, "does immigration really solve the worlds problems?" And, "what would be a good rate of immigration to the United States? Is there any limit to population growth?" "When will we address the limits to growth?" Have you ever even thought honestly about these issues, or are you just trying to make yourself feel like a hero by standing up for poor people? 
     

    Posted by Kevin Browning on 01/14/2009 @ 11:17PM PT

  9. Maritza Salvado

    I believe that if immigrants were allowed to come in and out of the country, it would not become overpopulated. The illegal immigrants have to stay in the country because they can't come back in. Those that have not experienced life in the USA come in because they think it is a better life, but would go back to their country as long as they are able to return if need be. Besides that, most of them still have their roots over there and eventually return. Not only that, I assume we are only referring to the latinos here and in fact they are more likely to go back home thatn the Chinese, Indians, Germans and Europeans who are also filling up this country and forming part of the illegal immigratin circle (I bet you didn't know that one).

    Posted by Maritza Salvado on 03/23/2009 @ 07:09AM PT

  10. Alan Stevenson

    If we put a stop to other injustices as well as the utter lack of freedom of movement - such as the lack of opportunities in the 3rd world which drives people to the 1st world - places like America wouldn't be an immigration magnet anymore anyway.

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 03/23/2009 @ 07:46AM PT

  11. Alan Stevenson

    If we put a stop to other injustices as well as the utter lack of freedom of movement - such as the lack of opportunities in the 3rd world which drives people to the 1st world - places like America wouldn't be an immigration magnet anymore anyway.  And there's other progressive changes which would help solve the unsustainable population growth too, such as getting rid of the taboos on contraception and homosexuality.

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 03/23/2009 @ 07:48AM PT

  12. Alan Stevenson

    Learn to read, then see above.

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 04/12/2009 @ 03:01PM PT

  13. Reply to thread
  14. james lane

    Kevin has got it right.

    Posted by james lane on 01/15/2009 @ 04:36AM PT

  15. Alan Stevenson

    Reasonable?  You can't be reasonable in forcing x number of people to live in destitution, because that in itself is not reasonable.

    As for children, why do the children of American citizens matter more than the children of people who are not American citizens?  Direct your anger at the roots of the problem not innocent people who are merely reacting to it, and if you really need someone to blame (and frankly the idea that someone always has to be punished for anything thats wrong in the world is a very simplistic worldview anyway) then blame the people who are actually responsible for creating and perpetuating that problem.

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/02/2009 @ 04:16PM PT

  16. Alan Stevenson

    Don't worry about the typoes.  And yes, their governments are forcing them to live in destitution.  Our governments are complicit by denying them an alternative, and by denying them humanitarian aid in their home countries, and by in many cases forcing their own governments through apparatus such as NAFTA and the IMF to cut welfare programmes and public fscking services.

    "and when the US goes into a a country to give them a new government so they can have the start of the way of life like we have here... they throw shoes at us and tell us to get the hell out of their country"
    And no wonder.  The choice isn't between Saddam Hussein's thugs who have been armed by George Bush's thugs knocking on doors and dragging people out to be shot or George Bush's thugs knocking on doors and dragging people out to be shot.  There's a third option, which the Iraqi people were building up the courage to take when Bush bombed the sh1t out of the apartment block down the road, and which the American government would take as its cue to 'intervene' anyway as it did in Nicaragua in the 80s.

    "You can put them on the north of the border...and they'll still sit in squlor with a better address."
    Not least cos they have to worry about snatch squads.

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 04/12/2009 @ 02:55PM PT

  17. Reply to thread
  18. Wanda G.B.

    Let's do the math. Every illegal immigrant family can look to pay an immigration attorney, say, $4,000 for assistance. Multiple that by the 20 million illegals in the country and you get, hmmm, $80 BILLION dollars. A tidy sum for the profession, no? Of course it helps melt down the integrity of the whole country, but what the heck.

    Posted by Wanda G.B. on 02/10/2009 @ 05:00PM PT

  19. Michael Spead

    Consider the costs to American workers.

    If every illegal works for $5 an hour, the annual cost to United States citizens (and the United State economy since most of the money is sent elsewhere) is approximately $200 BILLION.

    Further, since it is estimated that the United States spends about $4K per year per capita on healthcare alone, that also equals $80 BILLION.  If you factor in education and other services, it is roughly $200 BILLION. 

    So basically, the 4K that each immigrant would spend to not break the law would provide U.S. citizens (and the economy) with an additional $200 BILLION or more per year and save this coutry approximately $200 BILLION in expenses per year. 

    I say make them legally enter and pony up $4K each. 

    Posted by Michael Spead on 02/17/2009 @ 07:51AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  20. Alan Stevenson

    Consider the cost to all workers.  If every corporate arse siphons a $2-3 off the top for each $1 they pay a worker, the annual cost to global citizens is approximately uncountable.  Don't blame other victims for the problems created by a tiny elite.

    As for 'make them legally enter and pony up $4K each', if someone's desperate enough to leave his friends, his family and his entire life behind, do you really think he has $4k?

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/17/2009 @ 02:40PM PT

  21. Michael Spead

    No offense, but that is not my problem or the problem of the millions of people that exist here legally. 

    It is obvious that the costs I posted explain the reasons why it isn't so easy to "save everyone from everything", like most of the people here are arguing.

    Posted by Michael Spead on 02/17/2009 @ 05:49PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  22. Alan Stevenson

    Its everyones problem if someones living in poverty.

    And okay, maybe everyone cant be saved from everything.  But everyone can be saved from artificial problems like engineered scarcity and border controls.

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/18/2009 @ 08:13AM PT

  23. Michael Spead

    Actually, you are way off base - it isn't everyone's problem.  It is the problem of that person, their family and anyone who chooses to help them.  But as the statistics below will demonstrate, most people do not think it should be their problem (and I agree).  People are free to make choices about who they want to help and how.

    It is not the place of the United States government (through the United States taxpayer) to provide clothing, shelter and support for people worldwide.  However, it is the responsibility of the United States government to take care of its citizens. 

    As CNNs 2008 poll showed, the vast majority of United States citizens felt that keeping illegals in this country was too expensive (63%).  Further, the vast majority of United State citizens felt that the rate of entry for legal immigrants should either stay at the same level (39%) or should be reduced (39%).

    That being said, I think you are entitled to your opinion, but it is definitely your own and not that of the people of the United States.

    Posted by Michael Spead on 02/20/2009 @ 12:15PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  24. Alan Stevenson

    Firstly, even if it was true that most people didnt think it was their problem, its the oppressed not the oppressor who decides whether the oppression is okay.

    Secondly, if you say CNN I say selective coverage - how many 'illegals' were interviewed? - and, again, CNN (and the rest of the corporate media - they do their absolute best to portray immigration as the source of all problems, in many cases resorting to outright lies, the coverage of the Lincolnshire strikes http://londonprogressivejournal.com/issue/show/58?article_id=374 a few weeks back in Britain being a good example)

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/20/2009 @ 06:39PM PT

  25. Reply to thread
  26. Michael Spead

    The first action of any illegal immigrant on United States soil is an illegal act.  We should not reward any person who breaks the law for any reason. 

    Further, once here, the typical illegal immigrants do not speak English, have questionable skill sets, live in poverty and off the grid.  This has the potential to damage our existing culture, communities and safety.

    Finally, if made into full citizens, illegal immigrants would pose an immediate drain on state and federal funds at a time when the country cannot afford to pay everyone's way. 

    I know it is easy to say protect and shelter everyone, but almost all pro-immigration arguments pull on the heart strings without having any rational approach.

    Posted by Michael Spead on 02/17/2009 @ 07:46AM PT

  27. Alan Stevenson

    "We should not reward any person who breaks the law for any reason."
    What, you wanna punish Rosa Parks for initiating one of the most positive changes in American history?

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/17/2009 @ 02:41PM PT

  28. Michael Spead

    Ok, so admittedly that language was a little broad, but I didn't write that statement in the 1960s.  I wrote it today, try to keep your arguments consistent with the times.  Rosa Parks could have sat wherever she wanted to this morning when I wrote that comment.  

    Posted by Michael Spead on 02/17/2009 @ 05:53PM PT

  29. Alan Stevenson

    The law is no more all-important or undisputable now than it was in the 60s.

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/18/2009 @ 08:10AM PT

  30. Michael Spead

    Arguing that someone who lived here legally but was treated as a second class citizen is different then arguing that someone who snuck into this country illegally should be sent home to where they are a legal resident.  Your argument is completely unrelated and an apples to oranges debate that doesn't apply in the current context of this discussion.

    Posted by Michael Spead on 02/18/2009 @ 08:29AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  31. Alan Stevenson

    Lets leave aside the fact that that wasn't my argument anyway, its actually not different at all.  The law has almost no relevence whatsoever to someones right to live, or to support their family.

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/18/2009 @ 08:51AM PT

  32. Michael Spead

    Based on what you are saying - that "the law has almost no relevence whatsoever to someone's right to live, or to support their family." 

    So you don't think someone should go to jail for theft or murder, as long as they killed an innocent person or stole from them to support their family. 
    Well, I am sure that anyone who ever breaks a crime in order to get paid could argue they are doing it to support their family. 

    You will have to do better than that.

    Posted by Michael Spead on 02/20/2009 @ 12:20PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  33. Alan Stevenson

    I support locking a killer up for the protection of society, if it's likely that he/she/it will kill again - but even then, its a second-to-last resort, with the first priority being to fix the problems which caused them to kill in the first place - but what the law says has little if any bearing on that.

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/20/2009 @ 06:18PM PT

  34. Reply to thread
  35. Michael Spead

    I think the tricky thing with this issue (as with most social issues) is that many of you have your hearts in the right places and want to help everyone.  Unfortunately, we also need to consider the negative impacts and butterfly effects.

    There are times when the costs of doing that right thing far exceed the benefits.  But when making a broad policy decision, you really have to consider if helping 1 man and hurting 1000 is worth it.  

    If the world were an ideal place, we wouldn't have any issues to face.  But we can't open the floodgates at a time when the country and the world are facing an economic crisis.  We just don't have the resources right now.  Maybe in ten years, we will be prosperous again and this will be an issue that we can afford to address.  For now, the country can hardly afford the citizens it has, let alone taking in new ones. 

    Posted by Michael Spead on 02/18/2009 @ 08:22AM PT

  36. Alan Stevenson

    Helping one man to a value of 10,000 (arbitrary small unit of benefit/detriment for the sake of this response) at the cost of -10 each for 1000 men is totally worth it.  A burden shared by many is a smaller burden than that dumped on a few.  Therefore helping one man to the value of 10,000 at the cost of -1 each (which is more accurate in this sense, since the strain on the host society pales in comparison to the value of having saved a migrant - or a family - from destitution)

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/18/2009 @ 08:59AM PT

  37. Michael Spead

    Alan, when you can back up any of your arguments with facts and not just by pulling on heartstrings, let me know. 

    Posted by Michael Spead on 02/20/2009 @ 12:01PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  38. Alan Stevenson

    It is a mathematical fact that fact that 10,000-[10*1000]=0, and that 10,000-[1*1000]=a positive value.

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/20/2009 @ 06:21PM PT

  39. Alan Stevenson

    When you say 'and not just by pulling on heartstrings', what would you say was a valid criteria for determining the best collective course of action for a society if not compassion?  Money?

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 02/20/2009 @ 06:23PM PT

  40. Reply to thread
  41. Helen Mustache

    URGENT QUESTION:
    My grandaughter (17 1/2), a U.S. citizen is engaged to and pregnant with an 18 year old, sweet, hard working  Latino/"illegal immigrant."
    If they get married, does he automatically gain US citizenship?

    Posted by Helen Mustache on 03/07/2009 @ 12:44PM PT

  42. Alan Stevenson

    I would have posted something like that under a fake name... if you post that you know an 'illegal immigrant' under your real name which they can track, you're in danger of getting him arrested by the ICE.

    In response to your question, I'm not an expert on immigration law but as far as I know, yes he would.  Another equally important question is... does it even matter?

    Smashing borders,
    Alan

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 03/07/2009 @ 02:14PM PT

  43. Reply to thread
  44. Alan Stevenson

    I would have posted something like that under a fake name...if you post that you know an "illegal immigrant" under your real name which they can track, you're in danger of getting him arrested by the ICE.

    In response to your question, I'm not an expert on immigration law but as far as I know, yes he would.  Another equally important question is...does it even matter?

    Smashing borders,
    Alan

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 03/07/2009 @ 02:13PM PT

  45. william spencer

    I appreciate our hard working immigrants who add diversity and value to America on many levels... BUT!!


    I deplore politicians who actively and passively allow the invasion which occurs every day from our southern borders. I live an a community with a heavy Latino population and I have absolutely no problem with most of them. I also do not blame these people for wanting a better life and pursuing it, because that is indeed the American dream.
    Unfortunately for our legal immigrants are painted with brush held firmly by those very politicians who proclaim to be on their side. They ignore the problem and OH YES IT IS.. a problem.. so that they can illicit votes from "The Latino Community".. unfortunately .. again... these same Latino Groups expect the same treatment for illegal and legal immigrants.... this simply CAN NOT be.
    Should we hate them for being here??.. absolutely not!!.. we shouldn't hate anyone much less strike out against them... BUT lets but the blame where it lay, directly on the Politicians AND the Latino groups that seam to think there illegal brothers and sisters should be allowed to trample our boarder and our nation's sovereignty. It may not be polite to "call" them illegals.. but nobody should fail to make the distinction, for being an undocumented worker is here illegally and that is a slap in the face of every law biding American - 1st generation American or 20th!
    Many people have made sacrifices, and some great, to obtain citizenship here and these people deserve our respect and help.. undocumented immigrants deserve neither and should simply should be detained and deported.. no excuses.. no sanctuary, because anything else is a slap the face of law bidding citizens...

    Bill

    Posted by william spencer on 03/13/2009 @ 12:52PM PT

  46. Alan Stevenson

    I'm with you, man.  Illegal is illegal, so it would be stupid to make it legal.  Circles are my favourite shape, especially the logical ones :D

    Proudly trampling borders and nationalism since 1989,
    Alan

    Posted by Alan Stevenson on 03/13/2009 @ 06:06PM PT

  47. Reply to thread
  48. Maritza Salvado

    I think if everyone went about their business and left illegal immigration alone, the country would be in better shape right now! But, who are my to say? All immigrants helped and help shape this country. Why can't we all get along?

    Posted by Maritza Salvado on 03/23/2009 @ 06:59AM PT

  49. J H

         I absolutely realize what a touchy issue immigration is.  My government teacher very politely asked our class not to speak of it for the fifth time today, and while I can understand her reasoning, that seems wrong.  This issue needs to be addressed.  I am only a fourteen-year-old high school student, so the overwhelming amount of material available on the subject looks quite daunting. 
         I do not know much about immigration law, and I do not know much about the circumstances that lead immigrants to settle here.  I must sound like an ignorant, uninformed girl with no right to speak about immigration, and indeed I am.  However, I would like to make a more fundamental observation.  I do not know what laws are in place, nor do I understand legal jargon, yet I know that immigrants are people, too.  I have sat next to latinos and spoken to them in their native tongue and asked them about their families.  Do you know, they sound remarkably like me, and my friends, and thousands of other Americans.  They have husbands or wives, jobs, and children.  Yesterday a six-year-old girl from Mexico read her book to me, pointing at pictures and telling me the English words for them. 
         I do not understand all the developments surrounding immigration, but I do understand that people in my school feel very strongly about this issue.  I sat in class yesterday, and listened as my fellow students spoke of the damage immigrants are doing to our country.  "The Mexicans should just go home," they said.  I wanted to speak up, to argue, but my voice was one against many.  They are sophomores in high school, trusted to drive a car and to decide their futures for themselves, and they speak without knowing any facts. I am not arguing that there is no factual basis for this argument, only that they, when asked, could provide none.  They pass on opinions purely based on prejudice. 
         One of the most moving experiences of my life occured a few weeks ago, as I sat with a hispanic friend on the school bus.  I am not a religious person, and when she said something about their Christmas traditions, I was curious to learn more.  I asked her to tell me the Christmas story.  In broken English, struggling to find the right words, she told me of a man who gave up his life so that others would be good.  She struck me as so incredibly human, so undoubtedly alive and deserving of a good future.  I know little about law, or politics, or even life.  My writing is not polished, and I cannot touch the reader with my words as I would like to.  I do, however, know enough to tell what a precious thing each human life is.  I know enough to say, "Latinos are people, too."  And I, and my hispanic friend, and the latino men and women and children living all across my county, state, and country, are glad that we are not alone.  Thank you, all who support latinos and other immigrants, for your compassion.

    Posted by J H on 04/29/2009 @ 04:18PM PT

  50. Lynn Grotke

    I believe that logic and fairness to American citizens/legal immigrants should be the priority in this matter.  It is unfortunate that so many people live in poverty in other countries in spite of all the money we shell out in foreign aid, but we cannot force other countries to take care of their own.  We also cannot absorb and afford to take care of all the illegals who come here.  Polls about illegal immigration should only include the fopinions of legal citizens, not illegals.  In my sphere of acquaintances I have yet to come across anyone who feels amnesty should be given.  We are themiddle class struggling to get by. We want our laws enforced and our own provided for.  No, our greedy politicians and corporations aren't listening, but that doesn't mean they are right.  You may want to make us a third world country but we are fighting to prevent that from happening.  I don't understand how you all feel the right to citizenship,when you are not honoring our laws.  I cannot understand why you think we don't have the right to limit immigration and believe we shouldn't have borders.  It just does not make any sense and is not logical.  I wish our President had the courage to follow former Presidents, such as Eisenhower, and end this mess.  This is a threat to our way of life, which many of you seem to feel we don't have a right to. Maybe there will be some kind of compromise we can all live with, but a total amnesty is not going to sit well with Americans, especially since it would only encourage more to come.  By the way we work hard too and do many of the jobs you claim only illegals will do.  I pray your own countries will improve, so you can stay there and prosper.  Otherwise, you should get in line and apply legally.

    Posted by Lynn Grotke on 05/21/2009 @ 12:23PM PT

  51. Robert Jones

    Hello, to all concerned, My wife came to this country in 1991from Romania on a k-1 visa and when she came here she came to marry my boss at that time who was from the same country, he told her he was divorced and invited her here under false pretences, because he was still married and was only thinking of divorce, And never informed her of this until 3 days after she arrived, and so he and his family used her to make his wife jealous, I know it sounds crazy but he and his family were complete emotional nut jobs. when she got here they stole her pass port and took her money away, they would not let her return home because she could cause a big embarrassment for their family. after that they didn't want her around anymore they tried to give her to a friend who tried to rape her. she is very extraordinarily beautiful (like Sophia Lauren)and highly educated nice, shy lady, but she knew very little English. upon hearing what happened to her I decided to protect her until she would find a way home. I was a salesman for this Sign shop and I traveled a lot and took her with me around on my sales calls, well we got to know each other and we fell in love and got married not knowing the Immigration laws, I was taught all through my life that if an American married a foreigner they were automatically a citizen, I found out soon afterward like every thing else that we learned about as far as or rights go here a pack of lies, just lies. A year later we had a beautiful daughter and struggled to make it like every young couple deals with. we didn't have money for attorneys and when we did they just riped us off and misled us in able to steal more money. the years passed Immigration lost or destroyed her file and assigned her number to 2 other people, as we awaited an answer about her invitation to return home and come back from the U.S. embassy, which never happened the lawyers could not get that paper work and this went on for 13 years and finally my wife filled for a court action to fix it that led to her voluntary deportation, either you do that or end up in a detention center. In that bogus court hearing the contract prosecutor and the judge had a joking and laughing session and good time in that kangaroo court and mock hearing under the color of federal law thus destroying my family, and absolutely no mercy or consideration other then how and when, my wife Luminitza of 13 years of marriage and the future of my American daughter Kim whom was 2 grades advanced in school and went to 2 John Hopkins University study programs before she was 10 years old, how would she function or me, especially my wife if the was family broken apart for 10 years (at that time the judge said a few months so she wouldn't appeal her case). murderers sometimes get lighter sentences then this. but here's the thing the Judge lied and said that my wife would be allowed back in a few months if she went to Romania and I filed for her return, when I did and the U.S Embassy in Romania sent me an approval, I flew over there to meet my wife and daughter and go to the Embassy and ready for their trip home. Instead my wife and I were told by the embassy she has a 10 year ban. It was so crushing to my wife's spirit that I thought my wife would commit suicide, thank god she didn't, it destroyed my and our daughter's love of America, she's an American who from the age of 4 would sign by her self the Unanimous Declaration of Independence, that she bought with her allowance, every 4Th of July on her own accord, now she See's America for what it really is, despotic heart less, corrupt and it thrives on the misery of others. That was three years ago. the court maintains that I have to make a minimum of $30.000 a year with a tax return as proof to bring her home, for 10 years that's slavery the I.R.S. is not a government agency your money is sent to the I.M.F., World Bank, there is no law any where mandating an American citizen to pay the I.R.S. or World Bank, any thing out of the money we earn from our labor. it would be involuntary servitude or debtors prison. Go look it up. So they maintain that I as an American have no rights to life liberty and a pursuit of happiness, to Marry whom I wish, to have freedom of association, The bible says in the book of Genesis that when you Marry you and your wife are one in the same, and didn't Ronald Regan and Congress 1980's voted that the bible was the principal instrument in establishing this country and its laws. it was unanimously accepted as fact and is in the law. and are we not the children of the posterity, by birth right to the U.S. Constitution those born upon the soil here in America. So if all this is true, there seems to be a denial of equal protection under the law. In American law a citizen of this country can never be exiled from this county. If this is so, and as the bible says me and m wife are one. (in the same) how is it that she has been exiled and my daughter by necessity also. As the judge told me I could go with her there to live in (poverty) is implied exile. and if my wife are one by are marriage contract by mutual consent and the courts by the way cannot interfere with contracts, with out the consent of both parties. I was deprived my property and inherited birth rights with out due process and a jury trial by my peers, it was not only my wife who was on trial but it was also myself remember my wife and I are one we own equally each other by marriage by mutual consent before God and the law , this in American Law it's Natural Law. Until our marriage is dissolved one or the other by consent or by death, The Government nor the courts has the authority nor can interfere in your or my marriage with out our consent by both parties this is the truth. so in this My 4Th, 5Th ,6Th and 9Th amendment protected rights of the bill of rights, were willfully violated, The U.S. Supreme court states that you have no rights because you don't assert your rights. its time we assert our rights, I'm going to file a law suit in the U.S. Court of Claims pertaining these issues and sue rightfully The United States for breach of covenant and demand a trial by jury, as an American I have this right and do so I wiped the word "SLAVE" of my forehead so should "You"  if you are in the same position as an American. Forget the brain (less) washed, incompetent and corrupt lawyers that buy into this diseased system instead of filing suit to remove this bogus and illegitimate tyrannical monster. they don't help you nor protect your rights, they take you money and sell you and your family down the river quikly. 

     

    Posted by Robert Jones on 07/04/2009 @ 10:50PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
Dave Bennion

David is an attorney in Philadelphia, PA, where he helps immigrants to the U.S. navigate the complex immigration legal system. Views he expresses at change.org are his alone and don't represent the views or opinions of his employer, Nationalities Service Center. The information contained on this site is intended for educational and advocacy purposes only.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.