Immigration - Change.org: USCIS Presumption of Fraud Stymies Legitimate Marriage Cases

USCIS Presumption of Fraud Stymies Legitimate Marriage Cases

Published December 01, 2008 @ 05:00AM PT

From the St. Petersburg Times (via BIB) comes the all-too-common story of the hell that a U.S. citizen and his foreign-born wife went through in trying to prove to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) that their marriage wasn't fraudulent.

The ordeal began one August morning two years ago when Nelly and Jeff drove to the offices of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in Tampa. They were there for an interview, the last step before Nelly could obtain her permanent residency, or green card.

Jeff was a native Floridian with a boom box plastered with stickers telling foreigners to speak English. Nelly was from Peru with a mind for business. They met when Jeff bought a banana from Nelly at the flea market. She liked that he let her make business decisions. Jeff, hard working and reserved, was happy to let Nelly do the talking.

At the immigration offices that day, the couple did not know about a nationwide crackdown on fraud marriages. Immigration officials say immigrants pay Americans $10,000 to $35,000 to marry them until green cards come through.

Agents separated and grilled them with questions. Jeff bungled his answers about the couple's address and phone number. They were living with Nelly's sister and he never called the house, he explained.

The agent told Jeff to come clean, he remembers. Jeff grew combative. The agent denied Nelly's application.

This happens All. The. Time.

Many U.S. citizen spouses assume they'll be treated with some level of courtesy, or at least given a chance to argue their case to the officer.

Veterans of the armed forces petitioning for their foreign-born spouses sometimes assume their contributions to the military will carry some weight--or again, at least a certain level of respect.

Wrong on both counts.

Interracial couples, couples with language or cultural differences, couples with a significant difference in age-all face higher scrutiny. Some U.S. citizens assume that an officer will not judge the validity of the marriage on the basis of the race of the husband and wife. Wrong again.

USCIS may deny that its officers utilize criteria like race or nationality to make decisions about the validity of a marriage, but USCIS officials will freely admit (as they have to me) that adjudications officers are under no obligation whatsoever to justify a denial to the applicants. "Yes" or "no" is all they have to tell you. So what is to prevent an officer from denying a case because the marriage is an interracial one? No one would ever know. And, if he is feeling magnanimous, the officer can always proffer the excuse that "documentation was insufficient."

USCIS will have a harder time denying that adjudications officers are getting pressure from their supervisors to deny more cases. If you go in for your spousal green card interview and the adjudications officer assigned to your case is a little low on his or her quota of denials for that month, expect more probing questions and a more skeptical attitude. Don't be too surprised when your case gets denied and your spouse ends up in removal proceedings.

Part of the problem is that case loads are too high and officers don't have the time to make a proper assessment of the marriage. Low-income applicants are placed at a disadvantage because even the U.S. citizen spouse may live much of his or her life "undocumented"-sans health insurance, no lease or utility bills because they are living with relatives, etc. Officers put a premium on documents like these that can prove a couple is married and living together. Finally, many officers work from a presumption of fraud that taints their judgment from the outset.

There are many adjudications officers who are honest and dedicated to their work. But the system vests so much discretion in adjudications officers that egregious abuses like this one are bound to occur.

I wrote more about this problematic process earlier this year:

The government views a failed marriage as validation that its anti-fraud procedures have succeeded. So much for family-friendly policies. . . .

I understand that the government has a legitimate interest in combating marriage fraud. But I would hope that the procedures they would implement for detecting fraud would be effective, efficient, and fair. They are anything but. At the end of the day, a married couple's chances of succeeding in a green card application have more to do with race, nationality, and socioeconomic status than they do with the underlying merits of the case. . . .

USCIS needs to overhaul the standards it sets for its employees and the policies and procedures it implements under executive authority. But more importantly, as we've seen time after time with the Bush executive branch, the situation calls for meaningful oversight and constraint by Congress. And Congress should review and reform the immigration laws to make them more effective and less unjust. Abuses like those in the Baichu case [USCIS officer coerced sexual favors from a green card applicant, in the process destroying her marriage and chances for a marriage-based green card] are bound to occur with such a vulnerable population--a vulnerability that has been consciously created and legislated by anti-immigrant groups in the stated attempt to make life so miserable for them here that they leave of their own accord.

Comments (11)
Like
Share this:

Comments

I just visited this site for the first time, and I totally agree that legal immigrants should be welcomed to the USA, but illegal is illegal. Deport them all, from where ever they come from, and tell them to follow the rules of legal immigration, and we will welcome them with open arms. We do need immigration reform now. Using the proven E-Verify system as a tool, and require for all employers to run data checks on employess and people searching for work. No pass, no job. This would employ many of the unemployed working middle class families that are being outsourced. We should also clear our prisons of illegals, and send them to their homeland. We need to revise the anchor baby situation. It is like many of the loopholes that exist now for corporate America. It's just a way of getting around the system. The system is broken. We need to change. We have to think of our country, and it's legal citizens first in this rough time of change. We need to employ the legal citizens of our country, and not give any benefits to any illegals.

Posted by Chuck Kristopeit on 12/04/2008 @ 02:25AM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Chuck
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
The bottom line here is and always will be the force behind illegal immigration. The US Chamber of commerce pumps millions into lobbying for it because businesses want cheap labor they can exploit. The biggest lobbying force in the World for decades gets what it wants and the Chamber of Commerce does not speak for the average US Citizen. So the way to fix this problem as well as most of the problems in the USA is simple= Eliminate all lobbying and return to government for and by the majority of "We the People" not special interests and corporations.

Posted by Steve Pieta on 12/04/2008 @ 07:01AM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Steve
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
Neither of you in any way addressed the specifics of my post. I've made it clear that I'm not a fan of drive-by restrictionist rants. Future comments in this vein will be deleted at my discretion.

Posted by Dave Bennion on 12/04/2008 @ 11:19AM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Dave
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
So, your saying that our comments can only positive towards Law Breaking Illegal Immigrants???????

Posted by Mike Farnam on 12/04/2008 @ 11:31AM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Mike
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
Great article Dave!

Posted by Claudia Olivas-Meza on 12/04/2008 @ 04:06PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Claudia
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
"So, your saying that our comments can only positive towards Law Breaking Illegal Immigrants???????"

Do the extra question marks make the question more likely to be answered? Or act to highlight the rhetorical character of the query? Or is it a blind cry from the heart at the miserable beauty of living as sentient beings in a meaning-less universe?

Is Law Breaking Illegal Immigrants a term of art?

????????

Posted by Dave Bennion on 12/04/2008 @ 07:48PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Dave
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
Viewed from another perspective... I was married (or at least I thought I was) to an immigrant from Israel. This person was devisive manipulative and demonstrated a complete disregard for US law. They disappeared shortly after the wedding. There has been no contact between us since. However, I recently found out that this person is in trouble with the law. It's frank to assume that all they wanted was a "Green Card". The real concern is that they haven't been deported and they'll probably be successful at staying.

Posted by Tiki Uri on 12/06/2008 @ 12:42PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Tiki
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
I think what David is actually saying is that this particular post is about the difficulties that US Citizens and their spouses are having to live LEGALLY in the United States. As someone who married someone from abroad herself and went through the greencard process, I can attest to how difficult the system must be for anyone who is not as privileged as others.

First, it is costly. To apply for a greencard now costs over $1,000 in fees. Secondly, the instructions for applications are very specific and challenging for an Ivy League educated native speaker of English to follow, let alone anyone whose first language is not English. Third, it is time consuming. Not everyone has the ability to visit USCIS field offices during business hours to ask guidance questions, and certainly not everyone has the finances to seek the counsel of a lawyer. Finally, although I thankfully was not required to do an interview (the 20 lbs of documents I submitted must have been sufficient), I cannot imagine how nerve-wracking it must be to 'prove' to a stranger in a few minutes that you are legitimately married to the person you have chosen to spend the rest of your life with through a series of random questions that may or may not apply to your situation.

The fault lies in many places. There are indeed so many cases of immigration fraud using the marriage greencard process, and these fraud cases cost the system time and resources that could be spent processing the hundreds of thousands of legitimate applications. However, it is definitely unfair that these fraud cases should color the decisions of the entire USCIS system. At the end of the day, USCIS officers are indeed holding the lives of many families in their hands in the decisions they make, and need to be increasingly sensitized about this.

The 'American Dream' has always been about people being able to 'make it' in this country despite their socio-economic circumstances. It has also always included immigrants who come to the U.S. for a better life. That those immigrants must suffer through a system that assumes the worst of them rather than the best of them completely dismantles that dream for so many people.

Posted by Phoebe Farag on 12/21/2008 @ 08:26AM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Phoebe
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
I wish they'd make it even harder.

Posted by Mike Farnam on 01/11/2009 @ 02:20PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Mike
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
Great piece, Dave! it's unbelievable that an inter-national couple must undergo such scrutiny. This highlights the age-old American tradition of mistrusting immigrants, which is always sparked by ignorance and fear.

Posted by Tina Shull on 04/27/2009 @ 10:17AM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Tina
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
Fear is the biggest problem in this country.Americans are afraid of competition by immigrants.Children of immigrants do better in school than indeginous American kids.Have you ever watched the spelling BEE on TV? Most kids on that competition have immigrants parents.

Posted by john smith on 06/08/2009 @ 06:29PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by john
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

Comment

Check Spelling

Email me when there are new posts to this thread
Comment Policy

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Get weekly news and action alerts about Immigration

Author Biography

Dave Bennion: Philadelphia, PA; David is an attorney in Philadelphia, PA, where he helps immigrants to the U.S. navigate the complex immigration legal system. Views he expresses at change.org are his alone and don't represent the views or opinions of his employer, Nationalities Service Center. The information contained on this site is intended for educational and advocacy purposes only.