USCIS Director Gets Ready for Immigration Reform
Published October 22, 2009 @ 12:00PM PT
'Modernizing Immigration' - The irony was unavoidable as the title of a foreign press center briefing held in the Capitol yesterday with new USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas.
After all, USCIS is a long-shot from what one would consider a 'modernized immigration' system. One only need to look through this great spoof of our immigration processing centers to see how desperately we need modernization of poor USCIS services and practices. It is almost impossible to get a response from them regarding individual case files let alone the ability to file applications online.
Mayorkas was on a public relations blitz and wanted to present the USCIS as a transparent body responsible for serving the public:
What brings me here today is another pillar of importance to the administration of our agency's work, and that is transparency. We are a public agency. We serve the public. And we, therefore, must be answerable to and responsive to the public.
That is really interesting since the last time we petitioned ICE to stop the deportation of a DREAM Act student, we were told to stop telling them how to do their jobs. Maybe the public nature of USCIS does not extend to answering questions about detention and deportation practices.
Mayorkas did admit that there may be shortcomings in the immigration system with respect to family reunification that should be fixed by immigration reform. While, he skirted around Obama's lack of progress on overhauling antiquated immigration laws and avoided any discussion about local police enforcement of immigration laws, Mayorkas did confirm the immigration reform will be vigorously pursued:
Q: Zoltan Mikes, World Business Press Online: What do you think about the plan of Mr. Obama of immigration reform? Why is after one year he is in office, not so much in progress?
Mayorkas: With respect to comprehensive immigration reform, the president has indicated that comprehensive immigration reform is a top priority of his and has remained so. He has designated an individual, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, as his point person in that effort. And she shares his commitment and his prioritization of that effort. We have embarked on developing ideas and learning from the public what the public would most want to see in the context of comprehensive immigration reform. And so we are active. The reform process is a legislative one. It is one that the legislature will ultimately accomplish. But the president is quite devoted to the effort, and we are pursuing that vigorously.
The USCIS Director was also quite clear that a pathway to citizenship for certain undocumented residents would be part of the necessary reforms and that USCIS is preparing for what that might entail in terms of budgetary requirements:
We are preparing for what comprehensive immigration reform might entail. And our preparatory efforts are the very same efforts that we would undertake to achieve greatest efficiency as an agency. And so we have the ability, for example, to accept certain biometric information of 6 million people in a year in our 140 or so application support centers throughout the country. We are developing a nimbleness that, should we need to address or capture biometrics of a greater-sized population of people, we are able to do so. So our efforts are well under way.
That should answer any concerns from the general public and immigration-restrictionists such as Kris Kobach on whether USCIS can handle the processing 'a flood of petitions.' In the past two years, USCIS has reduced service processing times from 12 months to 4.5 months and clearly needs more funding and support from Congress in order to become more efficient.
The entire interview is available here.
(Photo Credit: RR.com)
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Napolitano Says "Hands Tied?" We Don't Think So.
-
Five Questions with R Jay Pearson
-
USCIS, ICE Stuck in the Past
Comments (5)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Prerna obtained her Masters degree in International Relations in 2007 and took a hiatus from academia. During this break, she co-founded DreamActivist.org and helped launch a program for immigrant youth in the Bay Area (S4FC). Currently, she is also a Managing Editor at The Sanctuary. Views expressed on this blog are her own and not that of any organization currently affiliated with her. Contact email - prerna@change.org
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















Great post, Prerna! The question is, what will this reform ultimately consist of, and how will it benefit immigrants? So far, the promise of "reform" appears to be a tradeoff between policies that criminalize immigrants -- expansion of 287g, etc -- and the promise of a "path to citizenship." (note: amnesty is not even on the table.) So, you are right to point out the irony belying the PR by this administration. Mayorkas would have us believe that this is primarily a legislative process. But there is much that Obama could do to drive the process forward, yet he has failed to show real leadership on this issue. Here's what Obama could/should do if he's serious about reform (via Dave Bennion):
The President could take a stand against family separation and enact a moratorium on ICE raids until Congress passes a reform bill. He could end the widow penalty tomorrow. He could stop jailing asylum seekers to bring the U.S. into compliance with international human rights law. He could reform the Executive Office for Immigration Review to address the imbalances there--some judges grant 90% of asylum cases, some 10%. He could make immigration reform a priority. He could throw his weight behind the Dream Act. He could challenge DOMA so that the UAFA would be unnecessary. He could grant TPS to Haitians. He could advise ICE attorneys and AUSAs to work towards justice, not just easy wins (many of them do this already, to their credit).
There's a lot he can do in the absence of action from Congress. And Congress takes its cues from the president. --see Dave Bennion's comment on Looking Beyond "Deport or Legalize" for Immigration Solutions
Posted by fille rebelle on 10/22/2009 @ 03:05PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
C'mon Fille (Yes, I know who you are, the eye gives it away), How will CIR benefit immigrants? Its all their in black and white, Prerna points it out in the topic. What you are wanting, and in turn relating to, is what and how will it effect illegal aliens. Don't blur the lines, be forthright in what you are wanting. Keep in mind USCIS deals with immigrants and can do absolutely nothing in regards to illegal aliens. It would be DHS that you should be looking at, and even then Napolitano is limited in what it is she can do, then Congress. Obama is limited in what he can do as well, and Dave's ideals do require more than just a pen stroke from him.
Posted by Liquid Reigns on 10/28/2009 @ 04:58PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Oh yeah, he completely dodges the 287g question from a reporter. Everyone is pointing finger at each other. I do agree the President is responsible for not providing leadership on the issue -- he is toeing the middle ground and so is the rest of the administration. And without leadership, we are doomed to petty battles amongst interest groups using very ugly rhetoric.
Posted by Prerna Lal on 10/22/2009 @ 03:10PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I just got a speeding ticket. Should I ask that I not have to pay the fine because at some possible future date the speed limit on the highway may be upped to be in align with the speed that I was going?
Posted by Mark Lindley on 10/28/2009 @ 01:02PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
That's a stupid analogy given that any potential CIR bill comes with a fine. Not only that but those who are undocumented in the U.S. have to pay $1000 for adjustment of status with 485-I if they have a 245-I. I doubt you even know what all this means. Moreover, your analogy completely fails when referring to immigrant youth -- Would you also fine a minor passenger for merely coming along for the ride? Don't think so.
Posted by Prerna Lal on 11/02/2009 @ 03:23PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.