Immigration

Our Sabra and Shatila?

Published July 12, 2009 @ 09:19PM PT

What did the U.S. government know about the massacre of Taliban POWs at Dasht-i-Leili by U.S. allies in Afghanistan in 2001 and when did they know it?

New reporting from the Times describes the Pentagon’s noncompliance, if not interference, with efforts to investigate the killings.  If war crimes had been committed, why would the U.S. not want those crimes to be investigated and prosecuted?  What obligation does the U.S. now have to get to the bottom of what happened?

After a mass killing of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Taliban prisoners of war by the forces of an American-backed warlord during the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, Bush administration officials repeatedly discouraged efforts to investigate the episode, according to government officials and human rights organizations.

. . .

Survivors and witnesses told The New York Times and Newsweek in 2002 that over a three-day period, Taliban prisoners were stuffed into closed metal shipping containers and given no food or water; many suffocated while being trucked to the prison. Other prisoners were killed when guards shot into the containers. The bodies were said to have been buried in a mass grave in Dasht-i-Leili, a stretch of desert just outside Shibarghan.

A recently declassified 2002 State Department intelligence report states that one source, whose identity is redacted, concluded that about 1,500 Taliban prisoners died. Estimates from other witnesses or human rights groups range from several hundred to several thousand. The report also says that several Afghan witnesses were later tortured or killed.

. . .

Separately, 10 or so prisoners brought from Afghanistan reported that they had been “stacked like cordwood” in shipping containers and had to lick the perspiration off one another to survive, Mr. Spry[, former senior F.B.I. representative at Guantanamo,] recalled. They told similar accounts of suffocations and shootings, he said. A declassified F.B.I. report, dated January 2003, confirms that the detainees provided such accounts.

Mr. Spry, who is now an F.B.I. consultant, said he did not believe the stories because he knew that Al Qaeda trained members to fabricate tales about mistreatment. Still, the veteran agent said he thought the agency should investigate the reports “so they could be debunked.”

But a senior official at F.B.I. headquarters, whom Mr. Spry declined to identify, told him to drop the matter, saying it was not part of his mission and it would be up to the American military to investigate.

“I was disappointed because I believed that, true or untrue, we had to be in front of this story, because someday it may turn out to be a problem,” Mr. Spry said.

The Pentagon, however, showed little interest in the matter. In 2002, Physicians for Human Rights asked Defense Department officials to open an investigation and provide security for its forensics team to conduct a more thorough examination of the gravesite. “We met with blanket denials from the Pentagon,” recalls Jennifer Leaning, a board member with the group. “They said nothing happened.”

Pentagon spokesmen have said that the United States Central Command conducted an “informal inquiry,” asking Special Forces personnel members who worked with General Dostum if they knew of a mass killing by his forces. When they said they did not, the inquiry went no further.

“I did get the sense that there was little appetite for this matter within parts of D.O.D.,” said Marshall Billingslea, former acting assistant defense secretary for special operations, referring to the Department of Defense.

Is this our Sabra and Shatila?

How many Americans even knew this massacre in Afghanistan took place?  I’m ashamed to say I had never heard of it until the recent Times story, and I try to stay informed about international news and U.S. foreign policy.

After the story first broke on Friday, President Obama ordered his national security team to investigate the issue.  That is a good start.

[Image: Physicians for Human Rights]

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (2)

  1. Transitionland .

    This has been a fairly well-known war crime since..well, since it was committed. NY Times correspondent Dexter Filkins and photojournalist James Hill were there right before the massacre began. A teenage Saudi boy, a foolish runaway Taliban volunteer who had gone to Afghanistan seeking a grand adventure, gave Filkins his parents' address in Saudi Arabia and asked the journalist to tell them their son was sorry. The kid knew he was about to die, and so did Filkins. Hill photographed the boy (the last photo of him alive, injured and doomed in Kunduz) and took photos of the other POWs tied up and stuffed in trucks. You can even see a few of the photos here: http://iwpr.net/docs/hill_gallery_08.html

    In 'Descent into Chaos,' Ahmed Rashid describes the massacre and other crimes by Dostum's forces in vivid, gruesome detail. Afghan IWPR journalists have written extensively about Dostum's crimes, and the impunity the Northern Alliance warlord has so long enjoyed. I suggest you sift through the IWPR site for more background on this, as there is much more.

    http://www.iwpr.net

     

     

    Posted by Transitionl... . on 07/12/2009 @ 11:17PM PT

  2. Transitionland .

    I suppose the lack of outcry over this is partly due to the fact that the victims were Taliban POWs. "These guys were committing all kinds of crimes themselves, including massacres of civilians," some will argue.

    The correct response to that, of course, is that what these men and boys did before they were tortured and summarily executed en masse is irrelevant in the eyes of the law. They were POWs, and they were massacred. War crimes are war crimes, even when the perpetrator is an ally of the United States.

    Posted by Transitionl... . on 07/12/2009 @ 11:27PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
Dave Bennion

David is an attorney in Philadelphia, PA, where he helps immigrants to the U.S. navigate the complex immigration legal system. Views he expresses at change.org are his alone and don't represent the views or opinions of his employer, Nationalities Service Center. The information contained on this site is intended for educational and advocacy purposes only.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.