A History of Immigration to the U.S.
Published October 06, 2008 @ 05:42PM PT
To understand the immigration debate that has come into high focus in the U.S. for the last few years, you have to take a look back at the history of immigration to this country.
Early Immigration
Starting with the colonists in Jamestown and Plymouth, Protestant immigrants from England settled in areas along the Atlantic seaboard that would later form the United States.
Wait-stop-rewind.
A century before Plymouth, the Spanish had invaded Florida and settled there. The earliest permanent European settlements in what is now the U.S. were Spanish or French, predating English colonies by a good 50 years. Each new European group to arrive displaced the native inhabitants, who had themselves immigrated to the continent some 10,000 to 20,000 years previously.
Large numbers of early immigrants to the U.S. were victims of trafficking, entering with varying levels of volition into indentured servitude or kidnapped and brought over from Africa as slaves.
Alien and Sedition Acts
The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 were enacted in a time of unofficial war against France when the newly formed U.S. felt especially vulnerable to foreign attack. The Acts made it a crime to publish "false, scandalous, and malicious writing" against the government or its officials and extended the wait time for citizenship to 14 years. They were formulated and implemented by the Federalists to target the opposition Democratic-Republicans, but backfired in the elections of 1800 and 1802 as the Federalists were swept from power. One of the four component laws, which permitted deportation of male citizens of an enemy nation during time of war, was never repealed and is still on the books.
Anti-Catholic Nativism
Waves of Irish and German Catholic immigrants in the first few decades of the 19th century unsettled established Anglo Protestant natives and led to anti-immigrant riots (pdf) in several major cities. The 1850s saw an organized nativist political movement-the Know Nothings-that had some regional impact before dissolving as the political scene was shaken up by the Civil War.
Chinese Exclusion
From 1882 to 1943, the Chinese Exclusion Act prohibited Chinese immigration and made Chinese residents ineligible for naturalization. Threatened by the economic power of Chinese communities and influenced by entrenched racism, people of the Western states acted to keep Chinese out and marginalize those who were there. Chinese exclusion went hand in hand with anti-miscegenation laws, which survived the repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act by several years.
Ellis Island
Ellis Island's peak years as a port of entry spanned scarcely more than three decades (from 1892 to 1924), but Ellis Island has reached iconic status in popular American history. Having since joined the Irish and German communities as examples of "good" immigration, it's sometimes difficult now to remember that the Jewish and Italian communities that passed through Ellis Island were as feared and reviled as Mexican and Middle Eastern immigrants are today. The Ellis Island period led to a nativist backlash resulting in anti-immigrant raids and strict quotas on immigration.
Red Scare/Palmer Raids/Immigration Act of 1924
National security fears after World War One and unease with the changing composition of immigration from Northern and Western Europeans to Southern and Eastern Europeans led to the Palmer Raids, which swept up citizens and non-citizens alike. Public outcry stopped the raids, but soon afterwards, a national-origins quota system put a stop to the Ellis Island era of liberal immigration. The restrictive Immigration Act of 1924 set quotas by country based on the numbers of nationals present in the U.S. in 1890, and was justified by eugenicists as a way to maintain racial and cultural purity. The laws put in place in response to the Ellis Island period helped ensure that hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing from German persecution before and during World War Two did not enter the U.S., instead meeting their deaths in the gas chambers.
Racial Profiling - Japanese Internment and Operation Wetback
Geopolitics dictated immigration policy during WWII, as the end of Chinese Exclusion overlapped with the internment of Japanese-Americans, again on national security grounds. President Roosevelt initiated the internment of 110,000 people of Japanese descent, 62% of them U.S. citizens, and the Supreme Court affirmed the program's legality.
In Operation Wetback in 1954, President Eisenhower ordered border officials to target Mexican immigrants in a massive detention and deportation effort.
Recent Decades - Global Migration
The Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965 (the Hart-Cellar Act), changed the system of national-origin quotas to a family-based preference system. This led to large increases in overall numbers of immigration, and to major shifts in the nationalities of incoming immigrants from Europe to Asia, Latin America, and Africa.
This wave of immigration, as with earlier liberal periods, resulted in a backlash. 1986 saw the imposition of the first laws sanctioning employers of immigrants, and in the 10 years that followed, under pressure from a growing nativist movement, Congress made the immigration laws more punitive and more likely to result in separation of families and deportation of longtime residents.
The terrorist attacks of 9/11 led the government to round up tens of thousands of men of Middle Eastern descent and detain and deport many of them. Congress tightened the asylum laws, leading to higher rates of denial. Meanwhile, tougher security measures led the U.S. to admit as refugees only a tiny fraction of Iraqis displaced by the 2003 U.S. invasion. Straying ever further from the post-9/11 national security rationales for restrictive immigration policy, in 2006 and 2007 the federal government began targeting Latino immigrants in massive workplace raids and started construction on a border wall. National pro-migrant demonstrations in May of 2006 led to a backlash as bipartisan efforts to pass comprehensive reform of the immigration system were defeated in 2006 and 2007.
Related Posts
-
Test Your Knowledge of Immigration History
-
Santa Clarita Councilman Declares Himself "Proud Racist"
-
Anti-immigrant Movement Hamstrung By Members
Comments (6)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
David is an attorney in Philadelphia, PA, where he helps immigrants to the U.S. navigate the complex immigration legal system. Views he expresses at change.org are his alone and don't represent the views or opinions of his employer, Nationalities Service Center. The information contained on this site is intended for educational and advocacy purposes only.
Top Immigrant Rights Actions
Most Popular Immigrant Rights Posts
- Census Chief Arrives in Texas With Cops to Alleviate Immigrant Fears
- ACLU: Criminalizing Undocumented Immigrants Not in Our Best Interest
- Media Matters Fed Up With Fox News' Use of Term "Illegals"
- Immigration Officials Aided Labor Abuses, Human Trafficking
- United States Student Association Supports Undocumented Peers

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Email

Counsel Dave Bennion:
Quite comprehensive brief on immigration to the US. Cool. Possible for you to draft another brief, this time, on the Filipino migration to the US that now comprised the 2 to 3 million Filipino American community? Stories have it that the first Filipinos in America were Northern Filipinos (vernacularly, Ilocanos) who did exodus of the 1900s to Hawaii or Guam and worked in pineapple or apple plantations and as clerks, teachers, doctors and other professionals later on?
Wikipedia on Filipino Americans were quite outdated, or so it seemed to me.
What do you think, Atty Dave? Thanks and
God bless,Marc GuerreroJournalist
Posted by Marc Guerrero on 12/14/2008 @ 06:43PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Dave; In regard to the Chinese Exclusion Act does not China effectively have a Yankee Exclusion Act?
Cheers.
Posted by Kurt Thialfad on 01/27/2009 @ 11:06AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
1965 Immigration act, Quote: Among those who more accurately foresaw the future effects of the change in immigration law was a certain Myra C. Hacker, Vice President of the New Jersey Coalition, who testified at a Senate immigration subcommittee hearing: "In light of our 5 percent unemployment rate, our worries over the so called population explosion, and our menacingly mounting welfare costs, are we prepared to embrace so great a horde of the world's unfortunates? At the very least, the hidden mathematics of the bill should be made clear to the public so that they may tell their Congressmen how they feel about providing jobs, schools, homes, security against want, citizen education, and a brotherly welcome ... for an indeterminately enormous number of aliens from underprivileged lands." "We should remember that people accustomed to such marginal existence in their own land will tend to live fully here, to hoard our bounteous minimum wages and our humanitarian welfare handouts ... lower our wage and living standards, disrupt our cultural patterns ..." "Whatever may be our benevolent intent toward many people, [the bill] fails to give due consideration to the economic needs, the cultural traditions, and the public sentiment of the citizens of the United States." (U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Immigration and Naturalization of the Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.C., Feb. 10, 1965. pp. 681-687.)
Hart-Celler Act hearings 1965 Quote: Senate immigration subcommittee chairman Edward Kennedy (D-MA.) reassured his colleagues and the nation with the following: "First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same ... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset ... Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia ... In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think." Sen. Kennedy concluded by saying, "The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs." (U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Immigration and Naturalization of the Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.C., Feb. 10, 1965. pp. 1-3.)
"This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this." -- Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy on the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986
Posted by Dave Avery on 02/09/2009 @ 04:53AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
This was a very nice, if insanely truncated, look at the history of immigration in this country. I would liek to see you examine smaller sections of this history with more depth. For example, I would like to see the history of the immigrant investor visa get laid out in some detail, as I have always wondered exactly how it came to be and how it has evolved.
Posted by Mike Fitzgerald on 11/18/2009 @ 09:43AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Presently we are navigating towards the future but to do so without creating racial dilemmas, we must first understand our past. In other words, lets not forget where we came from and in doing so, properly explain to those concerned as to why stricter laws must be put into effect as soon as possible, thus the true meaning to "The Land of the Free" can and will continue to be a reality and not just a fading dream. The white picket fence is the invisble safety net built by America.
Posted by Arturo Salvador on 01/02/2010 @ 07:26PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
What is the point of even having Immigration laws, rules and procedures? Just open the borders and let anyone and everyone in. I tis a waste of time and money. We have plenty of money in this country to support and provide for every single person who wants a better life.
I want a better life than the one I lead here in the US. Does anyone have any suggestions of where I can immigrate to (legally or illelgally) for a better life? Because being a white natural born citizen in this country, I can't get any assistance or freebies to make my life better.
Posted by Renee Waugh on 02/09/2010 @ 02:08PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.