9500 Liberty: 9-11 Not the Same as 7-11
Published October 31, 2009 @ 07:00PM PT
9500 Liberty, a documentary film by Annabel Park and Eric Byler, premiered in San Francisco this past Thursday. Hosted by Citizen Hope, NDN and Netroots Nation, and attended by several city officials, it promised to pack a punch. After a three hour grueling commute with detours in the Bay Area, I made it to the screening just in time.
Named after the block on which one resilient immigrant resides, the award-winning documentary traces how imported anti-immigrant legislation in Prince William County in Virginia, tore apart the community, leading to a mass exodus of immigrants, which hurt even the biggest opponents of immigration. Curiously, the movie shows how a blogger (Greg Letiecq from BVBL) working with larger anti-immigration national organizations influenced the Board of County Supervisors in Prince Williams to enforce a legislation supporting immigration checks carried out by local law enforcement based on the shaky ground of 'probable cause.' Even as the immigrant community came out against the legislation, the board approved it unanimously. It was not till immigrants started to leave Prince Williams and devastated the local economy, that most people saw the error in the law and fought to repeal it.
9500 carries a message of hope, especially for new media. Eric and Annabel exposed the ongoing in Prince Williams through their Youtube Channel and became involved in overturning the law. A concerned Prince Williams resident decided to counter the hatred and vitriol spread by BVBL by forming Anti-BVBL.
However, the message for undocumented immigrants in 9500 Liberty is scary. Immigrants testified passionately in front of the city officials only to realize that the decision did not hinge on their public comments. Does that mean that no matter how passionately and intelligently we express ourselves, our voices do not matter? That does not bode well with students like Herta Llusho and Noe Guzman who just testified in Congress.
Do the most privileged need to feel the pain in order for things to change? In 9500 Liberty, it was not until Greg Letiecq from BVBL launched attacks on the popular Chief of Police Charlie T. Deane, that more non-immigrants started to question the sanity of the law. Exacting harm on immigrants was convenient until citizens saw their property values plummeting and businesses crashing. A friend commented later that in the national scheme of things, this would mean that the United States would have to spend billions in deporting all undocumented immigrants along with their legal immigrant families to realize the grave mistake of driving out immigrants, kicking out producers and consumers, only to entice them to come back. Is that the only way this country will heal and move forward on the question of immigration?
I hope not. Watch 9500 Liberty when it comes to your city. Let the healing begin.
Video Courtesy: 9500 Liberty
Share this Post
Related Posts
Comments (28)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Prerna obtained her Masters degree in International Relations in 2007 and took a hiatus from academia. During this break, she co-founded DreamActivist.org and helped launch a program for immigrant youth in the Bay Area (S4FC). Currently, she is also a Managing Editor at The Sanctuary. Views expressed on this blog are her own and not that of any organization currently affiliated with her. Contact email - prerna@change.org
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















imported anti-immigrant legislation?
Sounds like an oxymoron to me.
Posted by Kurt Thialfad on 11/01/2009 @ 05:44AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
In the documentary it is clarified that most support for the legislation came from OUTSIDE Prince William County. FAIR admits ON CAMERA that this is what they want Republicans to do to win elections -- promote anti-immigrant legislation county by county. The fact that the legislation was propelled by imported support is not debatable.
Posted by Prerna Lal on 11/01/2009 @ 10:29AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Yes, but ironically most support against the legislation came from OUTSIDE Prince William County, by definition from the illegal aliens themselves. Ths is self-evident and obvious. Those people speaking a language other than English and lacking the proper visa documents to legalize their presence are from OUTSIDE the county.
Posted by Kurt Thialfad on 11/01/2009 @ 11:56AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Exacting harm on immigrants was convenient until citizens saw their property values plummeting and businesses crashing.
How much, if not all of that sentence, can be blamed on the failing economy itself? Is it not now convenient for you to scapegoat immigrants and use them to justify your means?
Posted by Liquid Reigns on 11/01/2009 @ 08:17AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The economic repercussions in Prince William County went beyond the failing U.S. economy. As a political economist, I can testify to that without question.
Posted by Prerna Lal on 11/01/2009 @ 10:26AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
And what were the economic repercussions that went beyond the failing US economy?
Posted by Liquid Reigns on 11/01/2009 @ 01:56PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I believe Prena's statement. It makes common sense that the economic repercussions would go beyond the failing of the U.S. economy. Wouldn't it make sense that the repercussion would trickle?
Posted by Mary Pranzatelli on 11/01/2009 @ 10:37PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
You believe Prerna's statement, yet neither of you point to the economic repercussions you claim. Neither of you have shown/stated anything that was beyond the failing economy.
So, how do you know what to believe?
Posted by Liquid Reigns on 11/02/2009 @ 06:46AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
LR - The rates of foreclosures and downfall of businesses was higher than the national average but don't let an economist tell you that. Watch the movie for evidence. Or better yet, maybe write to the businesses and home-owners in Prince Williams who complained about the repercussions. It hardly matters how you want to interpret things, given the people of Prince Williams realized their error and change the law.
Posted by Prerna Lal on 11/02/2009 @ 03:27PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
A higher than national average rate of forclosures as a reason? California also falls into that category, as does many other cities, counties, and even states. The movie as evidence? What for? According to may news articles as of late about PWC, business and homes are making a strong rebound there. As for laws being changed in PWC, R Jay Peasrson and I have already had that discussion in another topic, they only changed the BOC by changing the wording of the law.
You still have yet to show any economic repercussions as per exacted due to immigrants.
Posted by Liquid Reigns on 11/02/2009 @ 04:19PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
If believe Prena's statements without her pointing out her posting a book of information. I trust her. However, you would have to prove her wrong.
My time is limited. I have to get up at 5am as a challenger and work the GOTV for both my brothers.
No time to question Prena's credibility with her statement. Sometimes liquiod...when you see someone knows what she is talking about 99.9% of the time you just have to go with the flow and trust her.
Have a good night folks and don't forget to work on GOTV tomorrow!!! :) Remember..Everything starts in your local community's. From the ground and up.....??
Forget that old economic theory.
Trickle down economics...It just doesn't work...lol
Posted by Mary Pranzatelli on 11/02/2009 @ 09:07PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I'm not asking for a book to be written in response, only a simple fact that shows that immigrants were the cause of the downfall in PWC or that they played a roll in the economic repercussions as alleged. How do I have to prove her allegation wrong, when she has yet to prove her allegation as a fact. And if you do some quick research, you will note exactly what I stated, the housing market and the business is returning to PWC at a faster rate than the national average.
Sometimes liquiod...when you see someone knows what she is talking about 99.9% of the time you just have to go with the flow and trust her.
They also call that, the blind leading the blind.
Posted by Liquid Reigns on 11/02/2009 @ 10:00PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The problem with PWC economically is not a direct result from the immigration issue. Like many parts of the US, PWC exploded with growth during the late 90's thru 2005, and it happened because power-starved politicians and lobbyists favored cheap labor, while the world experienced cheap energy, cheap goods, all while there was poor planning, poor laws, little enforcement, and reckless financial lending practices.
Needless to say, its only obvious a higher national rate of foreclosures would have occurred in PWC, and it doesn't take an economist to figure out, the development of a greater ripple-affect throughout the county, engulfing not just smaller businesses, but larger ones as well, would rack employment and overturn this county.
When the construction industry collapsed just before the recession, workers saw the labor jobs dry up. With their wallets empty, what would migrant workers be expected to do, when not a job is to be had?
The sad truth behind these two filmmakers are, they came into this issue with politically slanted opinions, already predisposed as to what message they would portray to their viewers. Take for example, the empty Latino restaurants they had filmed. These two movie producers portrayed the blame of the economic hardship, because the migrant community was scared off by red-hot racist conservatism. The truth is, there are ethnic and white restaurants throughout the county, still empty if not out-of-business today. These restaurants faced economic hardship, regardless if Stirrup, Stewart and Letiecq and their ideas had all dropped dead in the middle of the immigration debate, or not.
At the time, the people of PWC were already feeling the stress from the over-extension their county was enduring, created by its very own high-growth expansion policy. Their frustration coincided with the rise of the financial turmoil and the chaos within the undocumented Latino community, which didn’t quite have the same view for the law and civil behavior, as the rest of the “more permanent” county had. It all started with the city of Manassas inability to enforce its own housing ordinance, a fire that destroyed a house because electrical and building codes were ignored, and then a property-owner’s political statement in defiance against the historic code of the city.
Just as construction and expansion was peaking, and as political apathy was mounting by the national media and Democrats, charging after the Bush White House, the GOP-dominated PWC BOCS was overwhelmed, trying desperately to manage the promises and pressures from the pro-development influences in the country, a rise of conservatism coming to the defense of George W Bush and all things conservative, and a growing anti-GOP movement inspired by national media and politics.
It was all politics, not racism – just plain and simple raw politics and power. Undocumented laborers have no right to be in this country. They have human rights no doubt, but should they even be driving an automobile if they aren’t supposed to be here in the first place? Of course not, and when sick, undocumented laborers and their families should be tended to at the hospital, but should they be allowed to just return back into society where the laws says that shouldn’t be, all while citizens pay the medical bills? Just because our governments are too weak to uphold the law, does not translate to undocumented migrants earning the right to work or live illegally in this nation.
Excessive growth from the Clinton's 90's was done to top the 80s Reagan era of growth. Bush and Co only tried to replicate the Clinton admin, and did so with reckless abandonment in the first half of this decade. This country is brainwashed to believe such policy-making is the American-way.
When prosperity returns and the temptation to press the gas pedal on economic growth hits are elected leaders, lets hope we have enough sense to have already instituted new regulation governing migrant workers and their families, as well as the businesses who hire them, and the consumers who purchase their products. I pray citizens of this county and the nation, see thru the bias presentation Annabelle Park and Eric Byler have displayed in the past, which undoubtedly will again be the case with their next release.
Posted by flood guy on 11/03/2009 @ 12:07PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The problem with PWC economically is not a direct result from the immigration issue. Like many parts of the US, PWC exploded with growth during the late 90's thru 2005, and it happened because power-starved politicians and lobbyists favored cheap labor, while the world experienced cheap energy, cheap goods, all while there was poor planning, poor laws, little enforcement, and reckless financial institutions.
Needless to say, its only obvious a higher national rate of foreclosures would have occurred in PWC, and it doesn't take an economist to figure out, the development of a greater ripple-affect throughout the county, engulfing not just smaller businesses, but larger ones as well, would rack employment and overturn this county.
When the construction industry collapsed just before the recession, workers saw the labor jobs dry up. With their wallets empty, what would migrant workers be expected to do, when not a job is to be had?
The sad truth behind these two filmmakers are, they came into this issue with politically slanted opinions, already predisposed as to what message they would portray to their viewers. Take for example, the empty Latino restaurants they had filmed. These two movie producers portrayed the blame of the economic hardship, because the migrant community was scared off by red-hot racist conservatism. The truth is, there are ethnic and white restaurants throughout the county, still empty if not out-of-business today. These restaurants faced hardship, regardless if Stirrup, Stewart and Letiecq had all dropped dead in the middle of the immigration debate, or not.
At the time the people were already feeling the stress from the over-extension the county was enduring, created by its high-growth expansion policy. Their frustration coincided with the rise of the financial turmoil and the chaos within the undocumented Latino community, which didn’t quite have the same view for the law and civil behavior, as the rest of the “more permanent” county had. It all started with the city of Manassas inability to enforce its own housing ordinance, a fire that destroyed a house because electrical building codes were ignored which were done in order to defy the housing ordinance, and then a property-owner’s political statement in defiance against the historic code of the city.
Just as construction and expansion was peaking, and as political apathy was mounting by the national media and Democrats, charging after the Bush White House, the GOP-dominated PWC BOCS was overwhelmed, trying desperately to manage the promises and pressures from the pro-development influences in the country, a rise of conservatism coming to the defense of George W Bush and all things conservative, and a growing anti-GOP movement inspired by national politics.
It was all politics, not racism – just plain and simple raw politics and power. Undocumented laborers have no right to be in this country. They have human rights, no doubt, but should they even be driving an automobile if they aren’t supposed to be here in the first place? Of course not, and when sick, undocumented laborers and their families should be tended to at the hospital, but should they be allowed to just return back into society where the laws says that shouldn’t be, all while citizens pay the medical bills? Just because our governments are too weak to uphold the law, does not translate to undocumented migrants earning the right to work or live illegally in this nation.
Excessive growth from the Clinton's 90's was done to top the 80s Reagan era of growth. Bush and Co only tried to replicate the Clinton admin, and did so with reckless abandonment in the first half of this decade. This country is brainwashed to believe such policy-making is the American-way.
When prosperity returns and the temptation to press the gas pedal on economic growth hits are elected leaders, lets hope we have enough sense to have already instituted new regulation governing migrant workers and their families, as well as the businesses who hire them, and the consumers who purchase their products.
Posted by flood guy on 11/03/2009 @ 12:12PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
There is another aspect to the economic social upheaval which hasn't been mentioned much, but is a phenomenon that is well-known on an anecdotal level. It has to do with minority home ownership. What will happened is that a foreigner will buy a residence in the US (PWC for example) with the intention of making a profit. It was easy to get the mortgage because nobody was checking anyway. In order to make the mortgage payments the owner will rent rooms to other foreigners, mostly undocumented. As the work for the undocumented dried up, and enforcement became tighter, the owner could no longer hang on to the property because his tenants got either deported or unemployed.
There are many flavors and varieties to this basic story. The owner maybe Hong Kong Chinese buying a house for his son to attend college in the US; it may be a drug cartel interested in setting up a 'pot' house. Unlike many countries, there is no prohibition or restrictions against foreign property ownership in the US. With the push to increase minority home ownership, a foreigner sure looks like an American minority, and were treated as such.
I have heard this scenario from real estate brokers. If you visit a property, and the agent describes it a a multi-family dwelling, that's code for "it was inhabited by a crowd of illegals".
Posted by Kurt Thialfad on 11/03/2009 @ 03:54PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I will say one thing about the video... the lady at the end blaming 9/11 on illegals is an idiot, she has absolutely no clue. All the hijackers were admitted legally into the USA on visa's. I would hope that someone in the meeting clarified and corrected her ignorance.
Posted by Liquid Reigns on 11/01/2009 @ 08:37AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Lq;
OTOH, one could blame 9/11 on a "complacent" attitude towards national defense, and specifically homeland security. There has been lax tracking of the entry and exit of foreigners within the US; an attitude among the airlines to let their pilots cooperate with hijackers; poor communication between NORAD and the military; slow response to scramble jets; inadequate screening of airline passengers, etc. Certainly, our government's attitude and treatment of illegal aliens is a part, however small, however indirectly, of the problem.
Posted by Kurt Thialfad on 11/02/2009 @ 08:56AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"Immigrants" aren't the problem, they're here legally.
Illegal Aliens are the problem, they're not welcome here and they need to leave.
It seems that some people fail to see the distinction between the two.
Or maybe they think that if they call Illegal Aliens "immigrants" for long enough a fairy godmother will click her heels three times and ,..."it will be so."
I don't know why Change.org would even get involved in such an unpopular subject. There are many other things we can be doing that we really can change!
Out of all the people I know I can't think of *one* who is in favor of "giving" anything to Illegal Aliens except a trip home.
This isn't a "liberal" or "conservative" issue, it's a law enforcement issue. I'm very liberal on a lot of issues but not on this. Why would I be?
There is simply no sympathy for people who sneak into our country illegally. Look at what happened when Bush tried to push through an "amnesty", there were so many calls against it that they broke the senate phone system.
And many people wouldn't vote for McCain because of his position on this.
This isn't something I'd want to invest any time in and not something I'd be interested in .
You simply can't go against a "super-majority" of American voters. It's called the law of diminishing returns.
There are a lot of other things out there that we *can* have a positive affect on, homelessness, women's rights, gay rights, hunger, getting out of all those rediculous "free trade" deals that hurt a lot of people etc.
If you want to do something to aleviate homlessness people will want to help you, that is a sympathetic cause.
Posted by Thomas Porter on 11/05/2009 @ 11:25AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
So well spoken!
Posted by Wire Paladin on 11/05/2009 @ 04:35PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
(Or maybe they think that if they call Illegal Aliens "immigrants" for long enough a fairy godmother will click her heels three times and ,..."it will be so.")
Thomas Porter, I need a fairy godmother to click her heels three times and remove your ignorance.
Posted by Mary Pranzatelli on 11/05/2009 @ 04:58PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ignorance, Mary, was in thinkning that Corzine was going to win.
Posted by Liquid Reigns on 11/05/2009 @ 05:18PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Mary, I'm simply stating the facts.
I've been a member here for a few years now and there are some very good causes in here that we could really make a differance in. Trying to let Illegal Aliens remain in this country is not one of them. It's simple, most Americans are against it.
Look at the polls, "78%", "88%" "92%" against it and many others. Look at what happened to John McCain because he was for "amnesty" his own people turned against him!
Senator Kerry's office said the ratio of calls comming in on amnesty were "80 to 1 against."
And it was the same when I called Sen. Sununu's office.
'Nuff said.
If there's anyone to be angry with it's our government for being derelict in it's duties in this area. There is no reason that we should have 20 million people in this country who do not belong here.
In the military if you don't do your job you get court martialed.
Like Liquid Reigns above stated Corzine was big on "giving" things to Illegal Aliens and look what happened to him.
Now, we have a lot of work to do on homlessness in this country. Something we can make a *real* differance in!
It would be nice to see people refocus on this issue rather than spinning their wheels on something so unpopular.
I think every American should be outraged that we have any homeless in this country at all!
Posted by Thomas Porter on 11/05/2009 @ 06:50PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Mary;
I don't detect an ignorance in Thomas. I clicked 3 times, and as far as I am concerned, he is speaking the truth. This nation has so many problems, we can't look to abroad for the solutions.
Posted by Kurt Thialfad on 11/05/2009 @ 08:32PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Thomas Corizine lost because the unemployment rate is at 10.5% and that is the only reason why. New Jersey votes out of their wallet. In the New Jersey Republican party Lonegan was anti-immigration and he lost by a large margin. People are not anti-immigration. However, at the moment they are focused on healthcare reform and the unemployment rate. When the economy gets better these things will change. In 4 years mayor Cory Booker will run and he will energise the NJ minority base in a big way. Everyone loves Cory Booker in NJ. I actually thought Corizine should have stepped down and it was an inside rumor that he was going to but for whatever reason he stayed in the race. Chris Christie will most likely be a one termer. Chris Christie does not focus on Immigration at all. Anyone knows to stay clear away from that issue in NJ. Local candidate Jim levowitz from Bound Brook, NJ lost the election because he ran a campaign a few years back that was anti-immigrant driven. This is the second time he lost. People aren't into the hate.
Posted by Mary Pranzatelli on 11/06/2009 @ 09:21PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Mary, I don't think anyone in here is "anti-immigrant", but most people in the country are anti-illegal alien.
Again, two seperate and distinct groups of people.
Posted by Thomas Porter on 11/06/2009 @ 09:51PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Thomas Porter, I don't think the terminology matters much to anyone anymore.
I don' think anyone in here is "anti-immigrant", but I do think that most people in this country are also not longer "anti-illegal alien" either.
You might want to get a grip on your talking points. They aren't working anymore. If you noticed the president of the US continues to shift the terms in speechs as a means of communicating to different people who identify differently on the issue. However, the language does not matter. Most people are not against the "undocumented"...."illegal aliens"...whatever you want to call people.
Thomas Porter, you really need to get a real conversation going when you talk on the issues.
Posted by Mary Pranzatelli on 11/08/2009 @ 10:16PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Mary, you keep thinking that.
Posted by Thomas Porter on 11/09/2009 @ 10:41AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
When it comes to aliens from dangerous Muslim and other countries, the U.S. needs to secure its borders permanently, but when it comes to our next-door neighbors in Mexico, the situation is far different. Mexicans are not the Huns, they've been suffering from de facto apartheid for 160 years ever since the U.S. in its white supremacist days took half its territory for its whites-only homeland and left sawed-off Mexico eternally unable to be self-sufficient, with no lebensraum for future pop. growth. The current "U.S.-Mexico border problem" is really just chickens coming home to roost, and despite the downturn in the economy, terrorism, etc., it's a permanent problem that can only be fixed with a permanent solution.
What is the solution? Simple. It's time Congress finally ended the apartheid by officially inviting the people of Mexico to dissolve their failed ever-corrupt fatcat and cartel controlled Mexican federal govt. and join the U.S. as 10+ new states, allowing the border to go poof and Mexico's 760K sq. mi. of territory and 5.8K mi. of coastline to be developed as a U.S. sector, alleviating the root causes of poverty. Only then can all 313 million Americans work together sans racism to share the New World in peace and prosperity and take on the world. The new bigger seabound border will be easier to secure against world terrorism and real illegal aliens with incompatible values from overseas.
Learn about the Megamerge Dissolution Solution at http://go.to/megamerge
Posted by TL Winslow on 11/09/2009 @ 03:52AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.